<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Temporarily re-enabling catch-all domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.purity.net/blog/2009/02/25/temporarily-re-enabling-catch-all-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.purity.net/blog/2009/02/25/temporarily-re-enabling-catch-all-domains/</link>
	<description>Corporate blog for Purity Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.purity.net/blog/2009/02/25/temporarily-re-enabling-catch-all-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-5618</link>
		<dc:creator>George Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyantispam.com/blog/?p=140#comment-5618</guid>
		<description>Travis, that&#039;s a good idea.  I&#039;ll have to change our testing script to only check those that are currently marked as having catch-alls, though, as the full check takes about 24 hours to go through all of the domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travis, that&#8217;s a good idea.  I&#8217;ll have to change our testing script to only check those that are currently marked as having catch-alls, though, as the full check takes about 24 hours to go through all of the domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.purity.net/blog/2009/02/25/temporarily-re-enabling-catch-all-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-5617</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyantispam.com/blog/?p=140#comment-5617</guid>
		<description>In these last &quot;few hours&quot;, would it be possible for you to have your report generate every hour instead of every week?  I am scrambling to notify all of the domains that are listed in your report (thank you for providing that by the way), but would really like to know if our clients are fixing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In these last &#8220;few hours&#8221;, would it be possible for you to have your report generate every hour instead of every week?  I am scrambling to notify all of the domains that are listed in your report (thank you for providing that by the way), but would really like to know if our clients are fixing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.purity.net/blog/2009/02/25/temporarily-re-enabling-catch-all-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-5612</link>
		<dc:creator>George Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyantispam.com/blog/?p=140#comment-5612</guid>
		<description>As far as I can tell, Exchange 2007 by default enables SMTP transaction level rejection of messages to non-existant users.  If you&#039;d like us to test the server to see if it&#039;s working properly, please send an email to support@easyantispam.com with the hostname or IP address of the Exchange 2007 server and we&#039;ll run a quick test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell, Exchange 2007 by default enables SMTP transaction level rejection of messages to non-existant users.  If you&#8217;d like us to test the server to see if it&#8217;s working properly, please send an email to <a href="mailto:support@easyantispam.com">support@easyantispam.com</a> with the hostname or IP address of the Exchange 2007 server and we&#8217;ll run a quick test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Buonaspina</title>
		<link>http://www.purity.net/blog/2009/02/25/temporarily-re-enabling-catch-all-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Buonaspina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyantispam.com/blog/?p=140#comment-5611</guid>
		<description>I just installed a new Exchange 2007 server for this client: greyandgrey.com

How do I turn off catch-all&#039;s to this version of Exchange. 
Your procedure does not include this version. 

In the Exchange Management Shell, I ran the command:
Set-RecipientFilterConfig -RecipientValidationEnabled:$true

Is this all I need to do? 
Thanks!
Anthony :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just installed a new Exchange 2007 server for this client: greyandgrey.com</p>
<p>How do I turn off catch-all&#8217;s to this version of Exchange.<br />
Your procedure does not include this version. </p>
<p>In the Exchange Management Shell, I ran the command:<br />
Set-RecipientFilterConfig -RecipientValidationEnabled:$true</p>
<p>Is this all I need to do?<br />
Thanks!<br />
Anthony <img src='http://www.purity.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

